The blood curse of the market refers to the negative consequences and effects that can stem from excessive focus on profit-making and financial gains in the business world. When businesses prioritize profit above all else, it can lead to unethical practices, exploitation of workers and resources, and the neglect of social and environmental concerns. This blood curse of the market can result in significant harm to individuals, communities, and the planet. One aspect of the blood curse of the market is the exploitation of workers. In the pursuit of higher profits, businesses may prioritize cost-cutting measures, such as lower wages, poor working conditions, or even child labor. This not only violates human rights but also perpetuates inequality and poverty.
When a creature you can see within 30 feet of you takes damage from an attack or spell, you can use your reaction to temporarily weaken its resilience. Until the end of the target’s next turn, it loses resistance to all the damage types dealt by the triggering attack or spell (including for that triggering effect).
When a creature you can see within 30 feet of you makes an attack, you can use your reaction to roll one hemocraft die and subtract the number rolled from the creature s attack roll. For Blood Hunter, I m planning on the Order of the Ghostslayer for the Rite of the Dawn, and the one thing I m unsure of is whether to choose Curse of the Marked or Curse of the Eyeless.
This not only violates human rights but also perpetuates inequality and poverty. Another consequence of the blood curse of the market is the depletion of natural resources and environmental degradation. Industries may engage in unsustainable practices, such as deforestation, pollution, and overconsumption of water, in order to maximize profits.
Blood Curse of the Marked or Eyeless on my Fighter/Blood Hunter?
I'm currently playing a level 4 Variant Human Battlemaster using a whip, shield, and half plate, and I'm planning to multiclass into Blood Hunter for levels 6-8. The campaign is very heavy on the magic items, so I have a Whip of Disruption (reflavored Mace of Disruption), Smoldering Half Plate, and a Ring of Fire Resistance. I'm also using a mount right now. The homebrew world does away with planes, making them just regular places on the planet, and reflavors gods as powerful, but still technically mortal, people.
For Blood Hunter, I'm planning on the Order of the Ghostslayer for the Rite of the Dawn, and the one thing I'm unsure of is whether to choose Curse of the Marked or Curse of the Eyeless.
Blood Curse of the Marked:
- An extra hemocraft die (d4) on my rite
- The advantage from amplification is a bit redundant, as I already have Feinting Attack
Blood Curse of the Eyeless:
- Subtracting a hemocraft die (d4) from enemy attacks
- Extra potential flavor around the sun, which is what I'm going for
Other useful info:
- AC 19
- 18 Dex
- 45 HP (rolled an 8, 9, and 10 when leveling up)
- Our DM is doing lots of homebrew monsters, and she's also relatively new to homebrew and DMing in general, so they're not always balanced
- All dragons (and I think abberations too) have been reflavored as fiends, triggering the Whip of Disruption
- Party consists of a Peace Cleric, Thief Rogue, and an Evocation Wizard
- We all have 17 or more AC
- We haven't really been challenged by much (we killed a nerfed beholder at level 3)
- We might end up fighting an archdevil or demon lord
As a bonus action, you mark a creature that you can see within 30 feet of you. Until the end of your turn, whenever you hit the cursed creature with a weapon for which you have an active crimson rite, you roll an additional hemocraft die when determining the extra damage from the rite.
These actions have long-term detrimental effects on ecosystems, biodiversity, and the overall health of the planet. Furthermore, the blood curse of the market can result in social inequality and economic disparities. When businesses prioritize profit, they often neglect the well-being and needs of marginalized communities. This can further exacerbate existing inequalities and create a cycle of poverty and injustice. Additionally, the blood curse of the market can lead to unethical and fraudulent practices. In the pursuit of financial gains, businesses may engage in dishonest activities, such as accounting fraud, insider trading, or false advertising. These actions erode trust and confidence in the market and can have devastating effects on the economy as a whole. Overall, the blood curse of the market serves as a reminder of the negative consequences that arise when profit becomes the sole focus of business. It highlights the importance of responsible and sustainable business practices that prioritize not only financial gains but also the well-being of individuals, communities, and the environment. By recognizing and acknowledging the blood curse, businesses can work towards creating a more equitable, ethical, and sustainable market..
Reviews for "The Market's Blood Curses: Unveiling the Patterns of Destruction"
- Emma - 2 stars - I was really disappointed by "Blood Curse of the Market". The storyline was confusing and hard to follow, with too many characters and subplots that didn't seem to connect. The writing style was also a bit messy, with grammatical errors and awkward sentences that made it difficult to fully immerse myself in the story. Overall, I found it to be a frustrating and unsatisfying read.
- Michael - 1 star - "Blood Curse of the Market" was a complete waste of my time. The characters were poorly developed and lacked depth, making it hard to care about their fates. The pacing was also incredibly slow, with long stretches of mundane details that added nothing to the overall plot. The ending was rushed and left many questions unanswered. I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone.
- Sarah - 2 stars - I found "Blood Curse of the Market" to be incredibly cliché and predictable. The twists and turns were so obvious that they failed to surprise or engage me. The dialogue felt forced and unnatural, with characters speaking in unrealistic ways. The whole reading experience was underwhelming and forgettable. I was hoping for something unique and gripping, but this book just fell short.